Let’s start with the good news first.
Kingstonians can continue to breathe a collective sigh of relief as we enter this holiday weekend, knowing that there has been no new COVID-19 case identified in our Health Unit cohort for over two weeks. All 61 of the previously identified cases have been declared “resolved”. This is reason for appropriate celebration and considerable relief that we have passed a first wave of COVID-19 without experiencing the feared, overwhelming situations like those we have seen in some other centres around the world.
In addition the KFLA Health Unit figures indicate that only 18% of the cases in our district were “Community Acquired”, the rest being found in returning travellers or direct contacts of known cases. Our Health Unit serves about 215,000 people. That means that of the 61 diagnosed cases – I say “diagnosed” because we don’t know if there are others out there that we have missed because they were not tested – 11 of them arose from sources unknown or random community transmission. That is one such case in 20,000 people. Those are not bad odds.
Does this mean we can let down our guard? NO, indeed!
It means that the measures that have been put in place in our community have minimized the spread of the virus and it has had nowhere to go so it has temporarily petered out. But it is still there. And it is still there with a vengeance in Montreal, only 250 kilometres away. The reality is that our community remains highly vulnerable because we are still quite COVID-naive. So far, we Kingstonians are living in a bit of a bubble.
I wonder what will happen when we open up a bit or when people go to their cottage near Ottawa or when they visit their family in Toronto and return to Kingston. What will happen if we start to get people from Montreal coming for a summer weekend vacation? Or when some college or university students return to Kingston in September? If we become overly confident and let our guard down too much will we start to see more community spread of this virus that is still out there, waiting to find an entry point?
The World Health Organization this week has suggested that we are in for a long haul with COVID-19. Like HIV, it may be a pathogen that we will have to accept is here to stay. We will eventually develop some “herd immunity” that lowers its prevalence but it may always be there, lurking and threatening to surge if given the chance. There are also studies this week from both Spain and France suggesting that in these countries, where there has been a significant burden from disease this spring, only about 5% of the general population has antibodies. A similar study done in Boston and reported today discovered about 10% of the population had antibodies. This suggests that the prevalence of undiagnosed infection or sub-clinical infection is less than we had hoped for and that significant proportions of the population are still vulnerable to infection.
This week, the Canadian government approved an antibody test that will be very helpful in identifying what is happening in our various communities to track this infection and aid in management. It is not ready for widespread clinical use yet but this is a start.
Just like what has happened with malaria, and TB and influenza and HIV, I am confident that we will eventually come to learn much more about this novel coronavirus and develop strategies and medical managements that will lessen the impact or be able to treat it. We will develop better/quicker screening and testing for COVID-19 and be able to earlier identify and quarantine those with an active infection and their contacts. Maybe there will be a drug that can be taken by contacts that will suppress the infection proactively. Hopefully, we will come up with immunization that will help to improve the herd immunity. It will take a while to provide immunization to 7 billion people. Unfortunately, there will likely be a backlash and resistance from those who oppose vaccinations of any kind that will slow the process for the rest of us.
In the meantime we need to stick to what we have found is actually protecting us so far. Wash those hands often. Limit your close exposure to others. Don’t gather in groups where distancing is not practical and particularly in indoor closed areas. Work from home when you can. Consider wearing a mask when you are shopping or in a situation where physical distancing is impractical. When you are sick, stay home. Better yet, get medical advice and possibly a COVID test if it is advised so your recent contacts can be warned if you are infected and so you don’t spread it unwittingly to others. We will need to take particular care of those in Long Term Care facilities and, as a community, protect individuals whose co-morbidities put them at increased risk of serious consequences of the infection.
Although the last 9 weeks have felt like a lifetime, we are only just starting. The COVID-19 virus is new to the world. We are guessing to a certain extent, using scientific reasoning, how best to mitigate its effects at the moment but how this unfolds over the next couple of years is taking us down an unknown path. International cooperation and learning from the experience in other parts of the world has been helpful.
Some folks are eager and others might be understandably anxious about re-opening the economy. The bottom line is that we can’t remain in total isolation forever. My opinion is that if we proceed gradually in a responsible way and remain ready and responsive to deal with any emerging infection clusters that develop, we can go ahead with caution. It will be slower than we want and there will be challenges to working around new restrictions that will be in place for some time. We will adjust.
Life will change. Our societal habits will change. But humans are pretty resilient and flexible and we have science and technology that was not there for past pandemics on our side. Our short-term success shows that we can do it. It’s a long course ahead, however, and we will have to buckle down and accept that sobering reality.
John A Geddes MSc MD CCFP
Here is a message from our Local Medical Officer of Health posted today on the KFLA website.
It is a very good omen, no new covid-19 cases in the Kingston area over the past 15 days; BUT– do not be fooled, those little bastard viruses never get tired of infecting and killing people. So don’t you let down your guard and become a new statistic——- maintain social distancing and STAY HOME! We must wait till our Health Professionals can evaluate our current progress with any new cases or time without any and then perhaps, we can begin to return to normal. It is not that time YET!
I have one concern.
A couple of weeks ago my friend who is 82 went to Johnson 7 for an appointment.
She had recently fallen and had a brain injury and a fracture collarbone.
When they arrived they were told they didn’t need to wear their masks and could remove them. None of the staff wore masks.
There was no social distancing with one of the staff taking her by the arm and assisting her to X-ray.
I was so upset. This is exactly what we’re told not to do.
The optics from medical staff is terrible.
Thanks again for your updates
That does seem a bit unusual. Not sure what the protocol is at the hospital. At the Family Medicine Clinic the staff all wear masks and visors although, given the low prevalence in our community, gloves and gowns and full PPE has been set aside except for patients deemed symptomatic with ARI’s. (Who are mainly sent to the local assessment clinic at the Memorial Centre anyway if they screen postitive with any of the early questions.) It will be pretty hard to get back to providing full medical care if everyone is in a robot suit all the time.
I am wondering if we shouldn’t be doing a lot more testing of “things” along with people, for example children’s playground equipment, with the heat of the sun to help are we actually seeing any virus on them, could they be open for small groups at a time ?How much checking is being done of inanimate objects ? It might help with the whole opening up process
That’s a good question. I don’t think we clearly understand where “things” sit in the infectious process. Just because we can identify some elements of the virus on on inanimate objects doesn’t necessarily mean that it is enough to transfer infection. We need to learn much more about the role of “fo mites” here and just how much virus transmission is needed to cause infection.